Robots Atlas>ROBOTS ATLAS
Robotics

RFM

2023ActivePublished: 1 September 2026Updated: 1 September 2026Published
Key innovation
Bringing the foundation-model paradigm to robotics: a single large model pretrained on massive, diverse (often cross-embodiment) data replaces per-task, per-robot policies trained from scratch, enabling knowledge transfer across platforms.
Category
Robotics
Abstraction level
Paradigm
Operation level
Robot controlModelTraining
Use cases
Object manipulation (grasping, pick-and-place)General-purpose humanoid robotsLanguage-conditioned control (natural-language instructions)Cross-embodiment transfer across different robotsMobile manipulation tasksDexterous manipulation (laundry folding, table cleaning)

How it works

An RFM typically couples a pretrained vision-language backbone (VLM), which contributes internet-scale semantic knowledge, with an action head that generates motor commands. The model takes observations (camera images, robot state) and an instruction (natural language or goal image) and produces actions. Different action representations are used: discretizing actions as text tokens with autoregressive decoding (RT-2, OpenVLA), predicting action chunks with a diffusion head (Diffusion Policy, GR00T N1 System 1), or via flow matching (π0). Training uses a heterogeneous data pyramid — real robot trajectories, human videos, and synthetic data — and cross-embodiment data from many robots at once, enabled by a shared observation/action space. Adaptation to a new robot or task is done through fine-tuning (often within hours on a consumer GPU) or by changing the language instruction. Some models (GR00T N1) use a dual-system architecture: a slower vision-language module (System 2) and a fast, real-time motor controller (System 1).

Problem solved

Classical robot policies are designed per task, trained on narrow datasets, and deployed in specific environments on a specific robot, so they generalize poorly and require expensive data collection for each new platform. RFMs address this by using large-scale pretraining and cross-embodiment data so that a single model generalizes to new objects, instructions, and robots with minimal fine-tuning.

Components

Vision-Language Backbone (VLM)Perception and understanding of scene and instruction

A pretrained vision-language model contributing internet-scale semantic knowledge; processes images and language instructions.

Official

Action HeadGenerating robot control actions

The module generating motor commands: action tokens (autoregression), a diffusion head, or flow matching, often predicting action chunks.

Discrete action tokens (autoregressive)Actions as text tokens decoded autoregressively (RT-2, OpenVLA).
Diffusion action headPredicting action chunks via a diffusion process (Diffusion Policy, GR00T N1 System 1).
Flow matching headA flow-matching head generating continuous high-frequency actions (π0).

Official

Cross-Embodiment Data & TokenizationSource of positive transfer across platforms

A shared observation/action representation allowing one model to train on data from many robots (e.g. Open X-Embodiment: 1M+ trajectories, 22 embodiments).

Heterogeneous Training PyramidFueling pretraining at scale

A data mixture: real robot trajectories, human demonstration videos, and synthetic simulation data, balancing scale and realism.

Official

Implementation

Implementation pitfalls
Action-space mismatch across embodimentsHigh

Different robots have different action spaces and sensors; without a shared normalization, cross-embodiment transfer fails.

Fix:Shared action/observation tokenization and normalization; training on a unified representation (Open X-Embodiment).
Inference latency vs control frequencyHigh

Large models may fail to generate actions in real time for dexterous manipulation.

Fix:Action chunking, diffusion/flow-matching heads, dual-system architectures (a fast System 1).
Sim-to-real gapMedium

Synthetic simulation data does not always transfer to a real robot.

Fix:Domain randomization, mixing real and synthetic data, fine-tuning on the real robot.
Robot data imbalance and scarcityMedium

Robot data is expensive and unevenly distributed across platforms and tasks, biasing the model.

Fix:Sample re-weighting, augmentation with human video and web data, careful data-mixture curation.

Evolution

Original paper · 2023 · arXiv 2023 · Yafei Hu
Toward General-Purpose Robots via Foundation Models: A Survey and Meta-Analysis
Yafei Hu, Quanting Xie, Vidhi Jain
2021
The term "foundation model"
Inflection point

Stanford CRFM (Bommasani et al.) coins the "foundation model" concept — pretraining at scale and broad adaptability.

2022
RT-1: Robotics Transformer

Google scales a transformer as a robot policy trained on a large set of real-world demonstrations.

2023
RT-2: first large VLA
Inflection point

Google DeepMind shows a vision-language model with actions as tokens transfers web knowledge to robot control.

2023
Open X-Embodiment / RT-X
Inflection point

1M+ trajectories from 22 robots; cross-embodiment training yields positive transfer (RT-1-X +50% low-data, RT-2-X 3x on emergent skills).

2024
Octo: open-source generalist policy

A transformer trained on 800k Open X-Embodiment trajectories; fine-tunes to a new robot in hours on a consumer GPU.

2024
π0: VLA flow model

Physical Intelligence couples a VLM with a flow-matching head for dexterous manipulation across platforms (single-arm, dual-arm, mobile).

2025
NVIDIA GR00T N1: humanoid RFM
Inflection point

An open humanoid foundation model with a dual-system architecture (System 2 VLM + System 1 diffusion transformer), trained on a heterogeneous data pyramid.

Hyperparameters (configurable axes)

Model sizeHigh

Parameter count of the VLM/policy backbone.

~1B (Octo, GR00T N1)
7B (OpenVLA)
55B (RT-2-X)
Action chunk horizonHigh

Number of action steps predicted at once (action chunking).

Embodiment coverageCritical

Number and diversity of robots in the training data.

Control frequencyHigh

Rate of action generation (Hz); critical for dexterous, high-frequency control.

Data mixtureHigh

Proportions of real robot, human video, and synthetic data.

Execution paradigm

Primary mode
Dense

Most RFMs are dense transformer-based models. Dual-system variants (GR00T N1) separate slow reasoning (System 2) from fast control (System 1).

Activation pattern
Input dependent
Routing mechanism

Parallelism

Parallelism level
Partially parallel

Pretraining parallelizes across many devices; on-robot inference is constrained by real-time control (autoregressive action-token decoding can be sequential).

Scope
TrainingAcross devices

Hardware requirements

Primary

Pretraining and inference of large transformers leverage GPU tensor cores.

Good fit

Google models (RT-2) trained on TPU; good training scalability.

Possible

Smaller models (Octo, GR00T N1 ~1B) can be fine-tuned and deployed on consumer/edge GPU on the robot.