Robots Atlas>ROBOTS ATLAS
Ethics & Law

Right to likeness and voice

ActivePublished: 9 November 2026Updated: 9 November 2026Published
Key innovation
Extends traditional privacy and personality protection to AI-generated synthetic replicas of identity — covering machine-generated voice and likeness, not only direct recordings or photographs.
Category
Ethics & Law
Abstraction level
Pojęcie
Operation level
ApplicationDeploymentData
Use cases
Protecting artists and musicians from voice cloningProtecting actors from digital replicas and deepfakesProtecting ordinary people from deepfakes and fraudConsent and licensing of likeness in advertisingCountering AI music imitating performersEnforcing takedown of unauthorized content

How it works

Protection works by granting a person control and consent rights: disseminating their likeness or voice without permission is unlawful and gives rise to claims. Enforcement mechanisms include civil actions (injunctions, takedowns, damages, compensation for harm), court orders, and — in newer statutes — liability extending to AI-generated digital replicas and to distributing tools that produce them. Sector rules such as the EU AI Act impose transparency duties, requiring generated or manipulated (deepfake) content to be labelled. Scope varies by jurisdiction: from civil-law personal goods, through state-level rights of publicity in the US, to proposed federal legislation.

Problem solved

Addresses the unauthorized use of a person’s identity — their face, body, voice and style — especially now that generative AI can produce convincing digital replicas without consent. It guards against commercial exploitation, disinformation, fraud and harm to dignity (e.g. deepfake pornography, fake endorsements, voice clones).

Components

Consent and licensingBasis for lawful use

Using a person’s likeness or voice generally requires their consent; consent can be scoped and licensed (e.g. for advertising).

Right of publicityCommercial aspect of identity

US doctrine treating the commercial value of identity as a property right, often descendible; the term was coined by Judge Jerome Frank in 1953.

Digital replicaSubject of new protection

An AI-generated, realistic reproduction of a person’s voice or likeness; addressed directly by the ELVIS Act and the proposed NO FAKES Act.

Deepfakes and voice cloningPrimary technological threat

Generative techniques that synthesize faces and voices, making likeness and voice protection practically urgent.

Regulation and enforcementLegal framework

Diverse sources: personal goods (Polish Civil Code arts. 23/24, Copyright Act art. 81), US state laws, the EU AI Act (deepfake transparency), and proposed federal legislation.

Evolution

1953
Term “right of publicity” coined
Inflection point

Judge Jerome Frank introduces the concept in Haelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum.

1988
Midler v. Ford Motor Co.
Inflection point

Appeals court recognizes that a distinctive voice is protectable against imitation in advertising (849 F.2d 460).

2023
“Heart on My Sleeve” — AI music

A track with cloned Drake and The Weeknd vocals (Ghostwriter977) highlights artist voice cloning.

2024
ELVIS Act (Tennessee)
Inflection point

Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act signed by Gov. Bill Lee on 21 March 2024 — first state law protecting voice against AI.

2024
Scarlett Johansson – OpenAI dispute

OpenAI pulls the “Sky” voice after claims it resembled the actress’s voice (May 2024).

2024
NO FAKES Act (federal bill)

Proposed federal digital-replica bill (draft 2023, introduced 2024, reintroduced 2025) establishing a federal right of publicity.

2026
EU AI Act — deepfake transparency

Obligations to label generated and manipulated (deepfake) content apply from 2 August 2026.